Thursday, October 06, 2011

Comment on Opinion by Prasodjo et. al:Turning petro dollars back on: a game theory approach

Comment on Opinion by Prasodjo et. al:



“Turning petro dollars back on: a game theory approach


http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2011/10/04/turning-petro-dollars-back-a-game-theory-approach.html

I appreciate the opinion written by Prasodjo et. al on October 4, 2011 (link above), in general, the opinion is interesting, however, I would like to share some critical comments.

My understanding from your opinion is that the royalty (and tax) system is better than the Production Sharing Contract (PSC), in the view of game theory. It seems that it is mainly caused by the cost recovery issue.

It is not true to divide the component of PSC simply into two categories: cost oil and profit oil. In most PSC (Including Indonesian PSC), there are three categories, First Tranche Petroleum or FTP (which is similar to royalty in other PSC model, please note that many PSC systems also apply royalty), profit oil and tax. While, in the Royalty tax system, the government only receive two types of payment, namely: Royalty and tax. Therefore, it is obvious that in the royalty and tax system, the government will not get a share of profit (profit oil).

In my opinion the conclusion of the opinion is vague simply due to misunderstanding in seeing what is cost recovery. This simple illustration below hopefully clarify:

Let’s assume that I and a friend open a business venture, let say “fried banana” with fifty : fifty scheme, if the cost of fried banana is 100, while the selling price is 150, then we will make a profit of 50. Each of us will get 25. How about 100?. This will also return to us (in the language of the PSC, we conducted a "cost recovery"). Of course, it is not make any sense if we are each investing 50, in the end, we only have the right to claim 25. This is not business, but community service.

The simple illustration above shows that in any type of business, there must be a "cost recovery". The difference is that, for non-PSC business, we can immediately claim such costs from revenue (such as illustration of "fried banana" above). Meanwhile for PSC business, we can not directly claim cost that we have spent, because it first must go through government for approval.

In general, the main goals of business are seeking a profit, not only recover the cost. If this is the case (only recover the cost), it is clearly better to put the money in the bank and earn interest. In oil industry, there is a time lag between expenditure and resulting revenue (could be 5-7 years from the money that we spent at the exploration stage, until the first production, of course if there is discovery). In addition, there is no interest earned from cost recovery. Therefore, it is misguided (and a bit funny) if anyone thinks that the oil companies aim is only looking for cost recovery.

If the oil company use the royalty tax system, they can simply deduct their cost from their revenue. It is worthy to note that the main idea behind the birth of PSC is the “government control”. In the royalty tax system, the government control’s will be minimized, it is difficult to understand the hypothesis mention that the oil company will be more cost efficient if they operate using royalty tax than PSC. To the best of my knowledge, there is no single paper/study support that hypothesis.

Let’s have another illustration: as we know, BP has many upstream operations around the world, with many types of contract: some are PSCs, other Royalty/taxes or may be service contract. I doubt if BP management treat their cost policy differently simply because one use PSC and other use Royalty/tax. In other words, it is ridiculous if BP instruct not to aware about cost with the PSC system since it has cost recovery mechanism. Because they know, the higher the cost the lower their share of profit oil.

In Indonesia, the concept of royalty/taxes is nearly similar to what we have used in the mining sector, how do we know that the companies in this sector conduct better cost efficiency?. In fact, since there is less supervision in the royalty/tax system than PSC, the possibility to do “unnecessary investment” may be higher, this will have an impact to lower taxable income, in the end, government will receive lower taxes.

Although, mathematically, it is always possible to design the same level of government take for both PSC and royalty/tax, in the case that the objective is to have higher government take, then it can achieved easier using PSC.

Any model has shortcoming, PSC is not an exclusion; it is not necessary means that replacing PSC with the new models automatically solves the problem. I am a bit concerned with the statement made by some observers that we are unable to manage the cost recovery so that we have to find other models without dealing with this (cost recovery) mechanism. The fact that there are unique risks and rewards in oil and gas industry, the end result of the new model that is introduced may produce less government share compare to the existing PSC model.

The issue of adopting a new model is also a hot issue in Brazil. Differ from Indonesia, the Brazilian government proposes to switch to production sharing contract (PSC) instead of its current system (royalty/tax) for potentially world-class discoveries in Santos pre-salt basin. Santos pre-salt basin is very important for Brazil oil industry, these projects will bring Brazil from net oil importing to a net oil exporting country.

Worldwide trends for the last decade show that terms and conditions in oil gas contracts are becoming more sophisticated, in the context of project economics, whatever the model selected, it may be the best from the perspective of the country (of course, one country may adopt some type of models depending upon the geological and other factors). For example, in Russia, majority of their contract models are royalty taxes with greater state participation for their national oil companies, surely this will provide the bigger share of profit to the country as a whole. My observation shows that the royalty taxes is only effective if the National Oil Company (NOC) involved in the block with significant share. If there no involvement of NOC or NOC has only minor share, The PSC is more effective as a tool to capture the economic rent.

Let me conclude my comment, the selection of model contract should be considered on case by base basis since there is a diversity of project risks (deepwater, mature field, marginal field, EOR project, new blocks offered, etc), therefore: a one-size-fits-all model does not exist.



*) Disclaimer: The views presented in this comment represent my personal views

6 comments:

AFW said...

Setelah memperhatikan PSC model (utk migas) maupun royalty model (untuk mining), kesimpulan saya adalah bagus tidaknya suatu model bagi negara adalah bagaimana isi klausul kontrak (any model) dan bagaimana pengawasan yang dilakukan oleh pemerintah tersebut. Pengawasan pemerintah masih tergolong buruk.

indra said...

terimakasih untuk informasinya semoga bisa memberikkan nilai manfaat untuk orang banyak..

Anonymous said...

Beberapa pertanyaan, mohon jawaban dr rekan2 & Mr Benny
1.Gmn caranya perhitungan operating cost/bbl crude lifting di EP PT Pertamina & contrator
• Untuk Unit EP Pertamina, apakah operating cost/bbl “di tentukan” terlebih dahulu , atau bagaimana mekanismenya.
• Untuk hal yg sama, gmn di State company di negara2 lain .
2.Gmn caranya perhitungan processing cost/bbl crude unit pengolahan RU PT Pertamina
• Untuk Refinery Unit Pertamina, apakah operating cost/bbl “di tentukan” terlebih dahulu , atau bagaimana mekanismenya.
• Untuk hal yg sama, gmn di State company di negara2 lain .
3.Berapa hrg yg “di bayar” oleh negara u/
• Crude oil hasil explorasi oleh Unit EP Pertamina
• Crude oil hasil explorasi oleh kontraktor
• BBM premium, Kerosine , Solar, LPG hasil processing di Refinery Unit PT Pertamina
• Di negara lain yg juga punya State Company, berapa harga jual di masyarakat untuk BBM premium, Kerosine , Solar, LPG hasil processing di Refinery Unit mereka
4.Kekurangan Crude oil u/ processing di RU Pertamina, di datangkan dr mana , melalui badan/lembaga apa, hrgnya berapa
5.Kekurangan BBM Premium , di datangkan dr mana , melalui badan/lembaga apa, hrgnya berapa.

Terimakasih sebelumnya atas partisipasi rekan2 & Mr Benny. salam tampumj@yahoo.com

PT Dwipa Citraperkasa said...

“A leader in well testing and early production facilities for the oil & gas industry”

As a group company with world-class capabilities in well testing and fluid, our top priority is to offer the best service for business-based energy and resources in Indonesia. Dwipa Group was established as a company providing Non Destructive Testing for the oil and gas industry. We believe that through commitment, determination and passion for growth, opportunities are endless.

PAK ISKANDAR said...

Hal yang tidak pernah terbayankan kini menjadi kenyataan dengan keluargaku,,,untuk MBAH SARTO kami ucapkan banyak terimakasih karna berkat bantuannya ALHAMDULILLAH keluarga kami bisa lepas dari hutang dan masalah,karna nomor “GHOIB”untuk pasangf togel,hasil ritual MBAH SARTO meman benar2 merubah nasib kami hanya sekejap,dan disitulah aku berkesempatan kumpulkan uang untuk buka usaha kembali,karna baik rumah sudah disita,,warung makan jg sudah bangkrut,,tapi itu semua aku masih tetap bertahan hidup dengan anak istriku,,walau cuma kontrak tapi aku tetap bersabar dan akhirnya MBAH SARTO lah yang bisa merubah nasib kami..MBAH SARTO orang paling bersejarah kepada keluarga saya…!!! Kepada teman2 yang di lilit hutang dan ingin merubah nasib baik dari pada sekaran HBG: 082=378=607=111 MBAH SARTO,dengan penuh harapan INSYAH ALLAH pasti tercapai.

PAK ANTO DI KALIMANTANG said...

BAGI TEMAN-TEMAN YANG SELALU KALAH DALAM PERMAINAN TOGEL DAN INGIN MERASAKAN YANG NAMANYA KEMENANGAN SILAHKAN HUBUNGI MBAH SARTO DI 082=378=607=111 JANGAN ANDA RAGU UNTUK MENCOBA DULU DAN YANG PENTING KITA BERANI MELANGKAH KARNA KITA CUMA MANUSIA BIASA YANG HANYA MAMPU BERUSAHA DAN BERDOA,INGAT SIAPA YANG BERSUNGGUH-SUNGGUH PASTI AKAN MENDAPATKANNYA DAN ALLAH TIDAK MERUBAH NASIB KITA KALAU BUKAN KITA SENDIRI YANG MERUBAHNYA…KALAU KITA BERSUNGGUH-SUNGGUH DAN NIAT KITA BAIK INSYA ALLAH OTOMATIS HASILNYA KITA AKAN RASAKAN SENDIRI,KARNA SAYA SENDIRI SUDAH MERASAKANNYA DAN SUDAH MELIHAT BUKTINYA KALAU ANKA DARI HASIL RITUAL DARI MBAH SARTO BISA MEMBAWA SAYA JAUH LEBIH SUKSES DARI SEBELUMNYA DAN SILAHKAN ANDA MEMBUKTIKAN SENDIRI.

BAGI TEMAN-TEMAN YANG SELALU KALAH DALAM PERMAINAN TOGEL DAN INGIN MERASAKAN YANG NAMANYA KEMENANGAN SILAHKAN HUBUNGI MBAH SARTO DI 082=378=607=111 JANGAN ANDA RAGU UNTUK MENCOBA DULU DAN YANG PENTING KITA BERANI MELANGKAH KARNA KITA CUMA MANUSIA BIASA YANG HANYA MAMPU BERUSAHA DAN BERDOA,INGAT SIAPA YANG BERSUNGGUH-SUNGGUH PASTI AKAN MENDAPATKANNYA DAN ALLAH TIDAK MERUBAH NASIB KITA KALAU BUKAN KITA SENDIRI YANG MERUBAHNYA…KALAU KITA BERSUNGGUH-SUNGGUH DAN NIAT KITA BAIK INSYA ALLAH OTOMATIS HASILNYA KITA AKAN RASAKAN SENDIRI,KARNA SAYA SENDIRI SUDAH MERASAKANNYA DAN SUDAH MELIHAT BUKTINYA KALAU ANKA DARI HASIL RITUAL DARI MBAH SARTO BISA MEMBAWA SAYA JAUH LEBIH SUKSES DARI SEBELUMNYA DAN SILAHKAN ANDA MEMBUKTIKAN SENDIRI.